Art Historians about the Works of Anna Myronova: Impressions and Contradictions

The reaction of Ukrainian art critics on the works Anna Myronova as one leading representatives modern is analyzed in article. most active (about twenty personal exhibitions and more than a hundred group exhibitions) honored contemporary young artists. In particular, her name stated Forbes rating (among 25 personalities) Most Successful Representatives Modern Art under Age Forty (2016). press attention to artist’s separate phenomenon. Starting with Shadows Grass (2012), each new project A. arouses permanently keen interest journalists. Articles about are published regularly official edition National Union Artists Ukraine Fine Arts, Science Society Knowledge Association, Museum Lane magazine, serious Internet portals, researchers write her. But number texts, their emotionality sincerity, cannot hide some kind confusion authors. After all, comments explanations given not even different, but opposite content. Thus, haiku sonnets C. Baudelaire, philosophy I. Kant M. Heidegger used, Huxley names great artists past (Leonardo da Vinci, Rembrandt, Claude Monet) mentioned for better understanding projects (such Drought (2012–2013), Disorientations (2013), Heat (2014), Heraldry Poor Arms Reminiscences Still Project (2015), Simple Actions, Things Fragments? (2016), Between Touches (2017), Space (2018), Along Current CUT (2019), Against Light (2020), Geotexts (2021), etc.). She considered be free from social issues or prejudiced them, brightest eco-art Ukraine, peculiar unquestionable urbanist. they see deep spiritual meaning, an original artistic meditation, way connecting forces energies universe. main ways methods researching Myronova’s revealed article, its purpose confirm refute fruitfulness expediency these methods.